AI-generated code security scanner for pre-PR review.

Use Radar as an AI code review tool to review AI-generated code from Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Qwen, or any agent workflow before the pull request exists.

radar scan . --quick

Why AI code needs a deterministic gate

Generated code can be plausible but brittle: copied patterns, oversized files, missing auth checks, hardcoded shortcuts, and low-signal changes that look reviewable until they land in a PR.

  • Secure Cursor code before push
  • Run Claude Code security review
  • Use Codex code review security context

Evidence to inspect

Use “AI-generated code security scanner for pre-PR review.” as the scope for this decision: verify the input, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.

Start this workflow locally

Suggested workflow

Scan locally, copy the agent fix prompt, rescan, then let CI enforce the same gate.

radar scan . --quick
radar prompt . --diff --copy

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Apply this page’s evidence to one real repository. For “AI-generated code security scanner for pre-PR review.”, confirm which finding is produced, whether the proposed next step is reproducible, and where local scanning, reports, agents, or CI should stop or expand.