Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate.

Choose the workflow for AI-generated code, private repositories, coding agents, pre-commit checks, or pull-request enforcement without duplicating evidence.

Start this workflow locallySee sample report
use-cases

Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate.

06
Primary coverage06
01AI-generated code security scanner for pre-PR review.Use Radar as an AI code review tool to review AI-generated code from Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Qwen, or any agent workflow before the pull request exists.LOCALSARIFCI02PR security gate for GitHub Actions and SARIF.Use GitHub Actions as the final PR security gate for high-risk findings, SARIF evidence, and reviewer signal.LOCALSARIFCI03Secure coding agents with local MCP review context.MCP tools let coding agents ask Radar what changed, what is risky, and what should be fixed first without guessing from raw terminal output.LOCALSARIFCI04Private code security scanning without source upload.Radar is a local code security scanner for private code security scans, no-source-upload SAST workflows, and offline-first review habits.LOCALSARIFCI05Vibe coding security: from local signal to shared gate.See how Vibe coding security fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.LOCALSARIFCI06CI/CD security gates: from local signal to shared gate.See how CI/CD security gates fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.LOCALSARIFCI

Use Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate. as a decision directory.

Choose the workflow for AI-generated code, private repositories, coding agents, pre-commit checks, or pull-request enforcement without duplicating evidence. Open the page that matches the concrete decision in front of you, verify its evidence and limits, then continue to the relevant implementation or proof page.

  • Scope: Choose the workflow for AI-generated code, private repositories, coding agents, pre-commit checks, or pull-request enforcement without duplicating evidence.
  • Evidence: Verify who runs the scan, which command starts it, what evidence reaches the reviewer, which threshold blocks a change, and how the team rescans after a fix.
  • Boundary: A workflow can make review repeatable, but it should not turn every warning into an automatic rejection or remove accountable human review.

Continue with implementation evidence.

For Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate., use these routes to inspect a real artifact, confirm the product boundary, or implement the workflow described in this directory.

Inspect a sample reportUse this route to validate the next step for Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate..Review the MCP workflowUse this route to validate the next step for Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate..Add a GitHub Actions gateUse this route to validate the next step for Security review workflows from local scan to merge gate..

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.

Start this workflow locallySee sample report