Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning

See how Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence
radar scan . --quick

What Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning means here.

This guide answers vulnerability scanning directly, separates the concept from adjacent categories, and connects the decision to a practical local review workflow without overstating Code Radar coverage.

Guide

Evidence to inspect

Use “Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning” as the scope for this decision: verify the input, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.
Guide

Apply this guide locally

Apply this guide locally

Coverage and concrete signals

Different inputs, evidence, timing, ownership, and blind spots of source and network scans.

  • Audience: Security teams deciding whether source scanning or network testing answers the current question.
  • Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.: A scope table that shows which claims each method can and cannot support.
  • Boundary: Source and network scans are complementary; neither is a complete security program alone.
  • Workflow: source code · network surface · runtime · deployment context
Feature: security scannerChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Security: securityChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Guide: sast vs dastChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.

From local signal to shared gate.

Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. A scope table that shows which claims each method can and cannot support.

StepCommand or actionDecision
1Run a quick local scanIs the signal useful?
2Inspect and repair findingsIs the fix specific and reproducible?
3Export portable evidenceDoes the reviewer need SARIF, JSON, or HTML?
4Promote the trusted threshold to CIWhich severity should block a pull request?
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high
Official source

Primary sources

Guide

Start with the problem you need to solve.

Open page →
InstallInstall RadarProofSee sample reportLocal SASTLocal SAST for Developers and CI

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Apply this page’s evidence to one real repository. For “Source-code vs network vulnerability scanning”, confirm which finding is produced, whether the proposed next step is reproducible, and where local scanning, reports, agents, or CI should stop or expand.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence