Dart security scanning for local and CI review.

See how Dart fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.

radar scan . --quick

What Dart means here.

Code Radar reviews Dart repositories where they live, combining supported source checks, secret detection, dependency evidence, code-health signals, and portable reports in one local workflow.

Evidence to inspect

Use “Dart security scanning for local and CI review.” as the scope for this decision: verify the input, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.

Scan this language locally

Coverage and concrete signals

Dart source files (.dart, pubspec.yaml, pubspec.lock) plus pub package and lockfile evidence evidence in one local review path.

  • Audience: Developers maintaining Dart repositories and their dependency manifests.
  • Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.: File-level source findings, secret checks, dependency advisories, and SARIF-ready output for Dart.
  • Boundary: Coverage depends on parsers, manifests, lockfiles, and rules; runtime behavior still needs complementary testing.
  • Files: .dart, pubspec.yaml, pubspec.lock

From local signal to shared gate.

Dart: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. File-level source findings, secret checks, dependency advisories, and SARIF-ready output for Dart.

StepCommand or actionDecision
1Run a quick local scanIs the signal useful?
2Inspect and repair findingsIs the fix specific and reproducible?
3Export portable evidenceDoes the reviewer need SARIF, JSON, or HTML?
4Promote the trusted threshold to CIWhich severity should block a pull request?
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Apply this page’s evidence to one real repository. For “Dart security scanning for local and CI review.”, confirm which finding is produced, whether the proposed next step is reproducible, and where local scanning, reports, agents, or CI should stop or expand.