Technical debt scanning that runs where your code lives.
See how Technical debt scanning fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.
radar scan . --quickWhat Technical debt scanning means here.
Code Radar uses Technical debt scanning to turn repository signals into file-level findings, severity, confidence, remediation guidance, and portable review evidence before a pull request is opened.
Evidence to inspect
Use “Technical debt scanning that runs where your code lives.” as the scope for this decision: verify the input, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.
Run this check locally
Coverage and concrete signals
Duplicate logic, dead-code signals, dependency cycles, oversized modules, and review-risk trends.
- Audience: Maintainers deciding which structural debt should be fixed before it compounds.
- Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.: Findings that name the affected structure, explain the review cost, and produce portable reports.
- Boundary: Debt detection is a prioritization aid; teams still need ownership, context, and a deliberate refactor plan.
- Workflow: duplicate code · dead code · dependency cycles · oversized files
From local signal to shared gate.
Technical debt scanning: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. Findings that name the affected structure, explain the review cost, and produce portable reports.
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on highPrimary sources
Validate the workflow on your own code.
Apply this page’s evidence to one real repository. For “Technical debt scanning that runs where your code lives.”, confirm which finding is produced, whether the proposed next step is reproducible, and where local scanning, reports, agents, or CI should stop or expand.